Tuesday, May 18, 2004
AnandTech Reviews the Dell Ultrasharp 2001FP
Posted by Jason Dunn in "ARTICLE" @ 09:28 AM
"Designing a 1600x1200 LCD for gamers was no accident. If you're a casual browser through our forums, you may note the dozens of inquiries about availability of low response time 1600x1200 LCDs. While 1600x1200 LCDs do exist (Dell 2000FP, for example), none of them have been able to pack the punch as a 16ms response time offering. Response time, as you may know, is the measurement, in seconds, as the LCD pixel twists to fully off, and back to fully on again. Although we certainly have our doubts about how important response time is (at least once you start getting under 25ms), many die-hard gamers swear by 16ms timings. Without further ado, let us see if this monitor is in fact just what the doctor ordered..."
This review was written back in November 2003, but since I'm hunting for a pair of new LCD screens myself, this review caught my attention. Maximum PC, a magazine I trust completely, raved about this Dell monitor. And so while I was initially reluctant to go up to a 20" and 1600 x 1200 resolution, it's starting to look like that's the direction I'm going to go. Any 2001FP owners out there? What do you think of your monitor?
This review was written back in November 2003, but since I'm hunting for a pair of new LCD screens myself, this review caught my attention. Maximum PC, a magazine I trust completely, raved about this Dell monitor. And so while I was initially reluctant to go up to a 20" and 1600 x 1200 resolution, it's starting to look like that's the direction I'm going to go. Any 2001FP owners out there? What do you think of your monitor?
